Published response to Rolling Stone 1990 RDLH review

Jane's Addiction news & discussion
Post Reply
User avatar
Jasper
The Co Co Club
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:42 pm

Published response to Rolling Stone 1990 RDLH review

Post by Jasper »

I posted this in a thread over at Ain't No Xiola, and I thought you guys might like to make it part of the library. It's my friend's response to Rolling Stone's shitty Oct. 1990 review of RDLH, and it appeared in the RS issue dated November 29, 1990:
Image
User avatar
hydro
Addict
Posts: 3652
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:20 am
Location: O-HIGH-O
Contact:

Re: Published response to Rolling Stone 1990 RDLH review

Post by hydro »

wow! thanks for sharing and good for your friend to get that published :thumb:
“I’ve got some advice for old people, you either keep fucking dancing or die.” - Perry Farrell
User avatar
Mike
Addicted Archivist
Posts: 5971
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 12:20 am
Location: In the mud
Contact:

Re: Published response to Rolling Stone 1990 RDLH review

Post by Mike »

For those of you who may not have seen it here's the review Jasper's friend was responding to.
Jane's Addiction
Ritual De Lo Habitual

Image

Rolling Stone: 2 out of 5 stars

By Erik Davis
October 18, 1990

One of the funniest things about Nothing's Shocking, Jane's Addiction's much-ballyhooed 1988 release, was how it skewed the conventions of L.A. Sunset Strip metal, managing to be distinctively perverse in a world already saturated with bad taste and bacchanalia. At times the music was glorious, playful psychedelic metal, as Perry Farrell's avant-gypsy garb, weird eye makeup and prepubescent voice plugged you into the visionary amorality of children. With its trippy nature imagery and porno bent, Nothing's Shocking struck the gong.

Ritual de lo Habitual finds Jane's Addiction thin and wandering, blowing ploys that worked before — overdubs and echoes, loose jamming, Farrell's playground melodies. Split into a hard-rockin' side and a prog-rock side, the album doesn't cohere — whatever the band members have been doing for the last two years, they haven't been practicing much. Sure, there are moments — the opener, "Stop," has an amazing bridge, "Ain't No Right" admirably sums up Farrell's creed ("Ain't no right/Ain't no wrong/There's just pleasure and pain") and "Been Caught Stealing" is a real jewel. A shuffling, upbeat bouncer with silly jazz chords and the best use of dog barks since Pet Sounds, the song expresses a bare logic of desire ("I want something and don't want to pay for it") that makes shoplifting seem as fun as collecting tadpoles.

Side 2's miasma begins with "Three Days," which starts out as fine, tempo-twisting bongload metal but loses it after Stephen Perkins's great percussion solo. I haven't been able to get through the rest of the side without nodding out — the dreaminess is pleasant enough, but I expected more. Unlike King's X or Faith No More, Jane's Addiction hasn't figured out that a successful prog-metal fusion requires tightness. The great bits here — gypsy fiddles, "Aladdin Sane" piano flurries, strange lyrics about crickets' bones and an erotic Jesus — are overwhelmed by meandering vocal melodies, orchestral keyboards and David Navarro's rote guitar wanking. Two-thirds of the way through, Ritual de lo Habitual starts sounding like a fourteen-hour layover in Kashmir, a long-distance runaround with only Juggs magazine and a pack of purple Bubblicious to pass the time.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/album ... l-19901018
"The quality of mercy is not strained, it dropeth as the gentle rain from heaven."
User avatar
paintsrdri
Radio Tokyo
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:27 pm

Re: Published response to Rolling Stone 1990 RDLH review

Post by paintsrdri »

:heart:
"Pero Los Queremos"
Post Reply