Slow news day- try this

jimmydeviljames · Post by **jimmydeviljames** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:50 pm

Apologies if this is the wrong place.

seeing as its a bit slow RE: janes news...

I figure i'm never going to hear a studio version of I Would For you so i decided to make one.

tear it to pieces if you so wish.. I made it with pure Love

http://www.myspace.com/aracadesoundau

intertwoven · Post by **intertwoven** » Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

There's a great studio version of "I Would For You".. it's a b-side on the stop single n' stuff. But hey, covers are fun, so rock on.

jimmydeviljames · Post by **jimmydeviljames** » Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:59 am

intertwoven wrote: There's a great studio version of "I Would For You".. it's a b-side on the stop single n' stuff. But hey, covers are fun, so rock on.

Demo version that is...

it is beautiful...

this one has more instrumentation.. and a little surprise at the end for nerds

TrevorAyer · Post by **TrevorAyer** » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:36 am

yup its also on janes first record called "one hit is all it takes" .. this version is cool tho .. dig the singin and "san francisco" at the end sounds great ... sooooo i guess that makes me a nerd

Post by **hydro** » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:42 am

I think it sounds very pretty jimmy!

Jasper · Post by **Jasper** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:10 am

I listened to this yesterday and here is my super-brief response:

*Vocals pretty good. A little plain, but inoffensive and fairly good at capturing the pitch and tone of vintage Farrell, albeit without all of the magic, or a number of distinguishing details.

*Don't dig the way the word "you" from the line "I would for you" is repeatedly sung as "you-o-ou." It's fine a few times, but I think it's more direct and effective when it's just a slide from one note down to another, without the rise in the middle.

*Production is nice.

*Sticking some Desconstruction at the end was a neat touch.

Overall, a nice job.

jimmydeviljames · Post by **jimmydeviljames** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:51 am

without ALL of the magic. bahahahaha

Jasper · Post by **Jasper** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:31 pm

jimmydeviljames wrote:without ALL of the magic. bahahahaha

OK, without any of the magic.

jimmydeviljames · Post by **jimmydeviljames** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:26 pm

Jasper wrote:
jimmydeviljames wrote:without ALL of the magic. bahahahaha
OK, without any of the magic.

its pretty fuckin magical... why dont u go auto-erotic asphyxiate while dreaming of Perry Farrell failing.

Post by **Mike** » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:21 pm

Jimmy, Jasper is a pretty cool guy and I'm sure he was only giving you some honest criticism.
I wouldn't get upset or angry about it.
When you put your work / art out there not everybody is gonna love or hate it.
Me personally, I like it and I appreciate you sharing it with us.

janesaddiction.org

Slow news day- try this

Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this

Re: Slow news day- try this