JANE'S 
i hope there are NEVER any plans to redo the vox [and bass].
sorta like ozzy did with blizzard/diary, only to go back to the OG
i know pf would never do this, it takes too long for any janes release
for what it is tgea is
Perry Farrell Critiques 'Nothing’s Shocking'
-
mothra665
- Räji's
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:30 am
- Location: 44515
Re: Perry Farrell Critiques 'Nothing’s Shocking'
I JANE'S
i hope there are NEVER any plans to redo the vox [and bass].
sorta like ozzy did with blizzard/diary, only to go back to the OG
i know pf would never do this, it takes too long for any janes release
for what it is tgea is
JANE'S i hope there are NEVER any plans to redo the vox [and bass].
sorta like ozzy did with blizzard/diary, only to go back to the OG
i know pf would never do this, it takes too long for any janes release
for what it is tgea is
"Whaddya doing cheering a guy over 30? Cuz I can still rock yer pants off yer fuckin' ass, and I'll do it 'till the day I die!"
Perry Farrell 07/20/1991
Perry Farrell 07/20/1991
-
Jasper
- The Co Co Club
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:42 pm
Re: Perry Farrell Critiques 'Nothing’s Shocking'
sandinista! wrote:i might be alone in this but i really loved his voice on XXX. to me there is a noticeable difference to his voice when you make that leap from 86/87 to 88. that extra nasally, high whiney, otherworldly voice from xxx really blew me away and is what really hooked me. i know it's there on NS but it's not quite the same. now, that may just be the differing production values between the two albums but to me that's always been one thing about jane's that has made me "sad", the fact that they didn't get into the studio sooner and didn't get perry's 86/87 voice on tape.
just my 2 cents
Well...we have demos and stuff, and NS was actually recorded 1987-1988. There's that acoustic radio performance too, which is more-or-less in a studio.